Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:28

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
‘Smash’ abruptly announces final show after Tony Awards drama in Broadway shocker - New York Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
AI Cracks Mars Mystery: 500,000 Streaks Solved Without a Drop of Water - SciTechDaily
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Would you date/marry a guy younger than you? If no, why not?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why do I sweat so much after applying moisture or sun screen on my face? I have normal skin.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Call of Duty plagued with issues after Season 4 launch - Windows Central
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Jesse Armstrong’s HBO Movie ‘Mountainhead’ Gets Early Release On Max - Deadline
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.